Lower electricity bills.
- Is that even possible?

The lighting, the office equipment which is in use, and, in particular, printing devices should be analyzed, observing the habits and behavior of specific users. Energy consumption profiling is also very important. We help in optimizing such profiling by looking at tariffs and contract terms for energy supplies, internal billing methods and supplier fees.

Few customers pay attention to this, however it is worth knowing that everyone has a specified maximum power allocation in the contract with the energy supplier. When overestimating an allocation, too much is paid for it, and when underestimated - the penalty for exceeding it.

The first and for many, the most important argument is to decrease electricity bills. Not everyone knows how big their energy consumption is, and how charges could be reduced.

Smaller bills mean savings for the company and more money for investments, employees and development. Equally important, the use of energy-saving solutions allows you to become independent from the political turmoil associated with setting energy prices. It becomes easier to calculate the costs of production, manufacturing a product, because the lower the consumption, the smaller the impact of changes in energy prices on the company's operations is.

Let's not forget about the positive psychological aspect of improving the quality of light. Employees concentrate more easily, they are less tired, and their efficiency and work comfort increase. This is another argument for modernization.

The implementation of energy-saving solutions is also supported by fewer interruptions in operation, which are ncessary to replace light sources. Downtime can be particularly burdensome in three-shift plants. The savings associated with not having to purchase lighting replacements, and not having to pay labour costs are obvious.

The last, albeit one of the most important and more and more frequently quoted arguments, is the reduced carbon dioxide emissions and the beneficial effect on the environment. While the pandemic is not the recommended energy-saving solution, let's look at it in this context. During the pandemic, the Earth gasped. The reduction in economic and industrial activity contributed to an unusually large decrease in carbon dioxide emissions. Does this change have to be only temporary?

It is worth learning from this situation and doing everything possible to remember the need for deep systemic transformations leading to a more sustainable economy, that will be good for people and the planet during the recovery period. Such changes will be real thanks to the introduction of energy-saving solutions that may not only contribute to the improvement of companies' finances, but also the quality of life of the Earth's inhabitants.